KIAS — AI and Maths 2026

Gauge theories · AI for Physics · Physics for AI

AI for Mathematics (Physics)   ·  Mathematics (Physics) for AI

Benjamin Suzzoni
UNIST — Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

Three fields of research (and more...)

gauge theories dimers, quivers, toric Calabi–Yau ML GNNs, unsupervised representations, XAI NN-FT field theory from ∞-width networks

Dimer models and toric Calabi–Yau

Seiberg duality graph — PdP6c
combinatorics of the brane tiling resolutions of the toric CY3

Dimer models and toric Calabi–Yau

Seiberg duality graph — PdP6c
every phase the same toric CY3, new perfect-matching multiplicities

Neural networks on dimer models

MLPGNN / GATv2contrastive pre-traininglinear probes

Question: what hidden structure can ML help us identify?
→ unsupervised learning, explainable AI, …

t-SNE of the label-free embedding coloured by physics

label-free embedding, coloured by physics it was never shown

The Neural-Network Field-Theory correspondence

The textbook description of a QFT is the path integral

\[ \langle\mathcal{O}(x)\rangle = \int\mathcal{D}\phi\; e^{-S[\phi]}\, \mathcal{O}(x) \]

but the measure \(\mathcal{D}\phi\) is generally not well defined — it is shorthand for "integrate over all fields".

We can define it

  • rigorously, sometimes (e.g. TQFTs)
  • by discretizing space (lattice)
  • or with neural networks and UATs

Key idea: use the initialization distribution together with the UAT to integrate over all network configurations.

\[ \int\mathcal{D}\phi\; e^{-S[\phi]}\,\mathcal{O}(\phi(x)) \qquad\longleftrightarrow\qquad \lim_{N\to\infty}\int_{\Omega}\prod_i^N d\theta_i\, P(\theta_i)\,\mathcal{O}(\phi_\theta(x)) \]

Correlators — and interactions

Correlators come from the generating functional, now an ordinary expectation value:

\[ Z[J] = \lim_{N\to\infty}\int_{\Omega}\prod_i^N d\theta_i\, P(\theta_i)\; e^{\int dx\, J\phi_\theta} \] \[ \frac{\delta^2 Z[J]}{\delta J(x)\delta J(y)} = \mathbb{E}_{P(\theta)}\big[\phi_\theta(x)\phi_\theta(y)\big] = K(x,y) \]

A free scalar with propagator \(K\):

\[ S[\phi] = -\frac{1}{2}\int dx\,dy\; \phi(x)\, K^{-1}(x,y)\, \phi(y) \]

Two ways to switch on interactions:

Finite-\(N\) corrections
step back from the UAT limit

Break the UAT requirements
e.g. statistical dependence of the parameters

e.g. \(\phi^4\)-theory, as a deformation of \(P(\theta)\):

\[ P(\theta) \;\longrightarrow\; P(\theta)\, \exp\left(-\frac{\lambda}{4!}\int dx\; \phi_\theta^4(x)\right) \]

Choosing \(P(\theta)\) and \(\phi_\theta\) — hence \(K\) — engineers different QFTs; leaving the UAT limit switches on the interactions.

Where the field is heading

  • Recover known theories — gauge theories, supersymmetric strings, CFTs — as architectures
  • Rederive their known predictions, now with the tools of NN-FT
  • Predict new results inside those same theories
  • Discover new theories, and their properties
  • Flow the distribution \(P(\theta)\) (is learning an RG flow?)

One of the goals: use the tools of QFT to study general ML setups: Physics for AI

Thank you

Questions are always welcome — b.suzzoni@benterre.com